https://www.box.com/s/21403f11a9319dc332f8
FIDUCIARY RELATIONSHIP UNDER RTI ACT 2005
One of the reasons for
declining information is fiduciary relationship.
Section 8.1.e of RTI Act
2005 reads as under:
“Information available to
a person in his fiduciary relationship, unless the competent authority is
satisfied that the larger public interest warrants disclosure of such
information”
Black’s Law Dictionary
describes a fiduciary relationship as “one founded on trust or confidence
reposed by one person in the integrity and fidelity of another.”
To qualify for
information as held under fiduciary relationship, it should have following
ingredients:
1. Information should
have been given to public authority voluntarily by the giver of information. Giver
must have choice whether to give or not and to whom it should be given.
2. Information should not
have been given to public authority under compulsion or compliance of any law
or rule.
3. Information should
have been given to public authority for using it for the benefit of its giver.
4. Information should
have been given in utmost trust, confidence and faith by giver in the receiving
public authority.
Some of the examples of
fiduciary relationship are:
Litigant-lawyer,
patient-doctor, investor-financial advisor, client-bank, beneficiary-trustee,
ward-guardian, attorney-principal, director-shareholder parent-child,
insured-insurer etc
Following information
held by public authority of third party cannot be said to be held in fiduciary
relationship if:
A] It is given to public
authority under compliance of any law or rule [e.g. Income Tax Act, customs
act, VAT, etc].
B] Giver has no choice
but to give information to public authority.
C] Information is not
given voluntarily by giver to public authority.
D] Information was not to
be used for the benefit of giver by public authority.
E] information is not
given in trust, confidence and faith in public authority.
E] it is in larger public
interest to disclose, even if held under fiduciary relationship.
Important CIC decisions &
judgements on fiduciary relationship:
i] CIC/AT/A/2008/01238 dated
07-06-2010
ii] CIC/SM/A/2010/001634/SG/14617 dated 15-09-2011
iii] CIC/SM/A/2011/001376/SG/15684 dated 15-11-2011
iv] Judgement dated 30-08-2010
of High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in
WP(C).No. 6532 of 2006(C)
-1. TREESA IRISH, W/O.MILTON LOPEZ Vs CENTRAL PUBLIC
INFORMATION OFFICER
v] Judgement of Full
Bench of High Court of Delhi, in Secretary General Supreme Court of India V
Subhash Chandra Agarwal, L.P.A. No. 501/2009.
The above material can be
used in first or second appeal.
Very helpfull piece of information. Thank you Mr Shah.
ReplyDelete