Thursday, May 29, 2014

ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS

Extracts you can use:

In Lucknow Development Authority V/S M .K. Gupta the Apex Court held that when public servants by malafide, oppressive and capricious acts in performance of official duty causes injustice harassment and agony to common man, renders the State or its instrumentality liable to pay damages to the person aggrieved. And the State or its instrumentality is duty bound to recover the amount of compensation so paid from the public servant concerned. (1994) 1 SCC 24,

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“If   civilisation   is   not   to   perish   in   this   country   as   it   has perished in some others too well known to suffer mention, it is  necessary   to  educate  ourselves   into  accepting  that,  respect   for   the   rights   of   individuals   is   the   true   bastion   of   democracy.   Therefore, the State must repair the damage done by its officers to   the   petitioner's   rights.   It   may   have   recourse   against   those officers."-  HON’BLE Supreme Court in Rudul Sah v. State of Bihar (1983) 4  SCC 141                                                              


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yet, forms of accountability may differ but the basic idea remains the same that the holders of High Public Office having access to Public funds must be able to publicly justify their exercise of power not only as legally valid but also socially wise just and reasonable, chiefly designed to add something more to the quality of life of the people. Every exercise of Power depends on this ideal for its validity.

________________________________________________________________

“Act in discharge of official duty- Where public servant commits the offence of cheating or abets another so to cheat, the offence committed by him is not one while he is acting or purporting to act in the discharge of official duty, such offences have no connection with official duty, the official position only furnishing occasion or opportunity to do such acts.-AIR 1960 SC266.”
________________________________________________________________

“1. People in power and authority should not easily lose equanimity, composure and appreciation for the problems of the lesser mortals. They are always expected to remember that power and authority must be judiciously exercised according to the laws and human compassion. Arrogance and vanity have no place in discharge of their official functions and duties. ” -Supreme Court on 18-02-2010 in CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1429-1430 OF 2010

________________________________________________________________


“……..The responsibility of officials to explain and to justify their acts is the chief safeguard against oppression and corruption.” -Supreme Court of India Constitutional Bench in The State of UP v. Raj Narain, AIR 1975 SC 865 

________________________________________________________________

No comments:

Post a Comment